Thursday, November 27, 2008

Event Essay


Ryan Klaus
Professor Yerkes

Comp 106

25 November 2008

Twinkle Twinkle
If you ask any English-speaking young child to sing you a nursery rhyme, I am willing to bet that at least half of them will start in with the melodious tunes of “Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star”. This fascination with the stars, however, is not age discriminative. The stars have captivated humans as long as they have been on this planet, sometimes dotting the midnight canopy with diamonds and providing a brilliant scene to gaze upon, and sometimes helping sailors find their way home. Whether your interest in stars is for their aesthetic value or is academic in nature, a recent event regarding a star forty times the size of our own sun is sure to pique your interest.
On Friday, March 21, 2008 at 2:12 a.m., the light from a star that exploded in a massive gamma-ray burst halfway across the known universe was detected by the NASA “Swift” satellite, which picks up gamma-ray bursts.
“NASA's Swift spacecraft is being readied for a mission to scan the sky for gamma-ray bursts, cosmic explosions that can burn with the intensity of billions of suns in less than a second. Researchers hope the mission will identify the events that trigger the bursts.” (Malik)
“The gamma rays were detected by NASA's Swift satellite at 2:12 a.m. "We'd never seen one before so bright and at such a distance," NASA's Neil Gehrels said. It was bright enough to be seen with the naked eye.” (Borenstein).
The burst of light given off by the star actually happened when the universe was only half its age. The reason for this delay is the incredible distance between the star and the Earth; the light from the explosion, even at its speed of 299, 792, 458 miles per second, took roughly seven and a half billion years to reach Earth. These numbers are staggering, as it proves just how unfathomable the size of our universe is. However, the truly thing amazing about the explosion was the fact that it was visible with the naked eye here on Earth. That means after traveling all that huge distance over billions of years, it still was bright enough to be seen with an unaided eye.
“The starburst would have appeared as bright as some of the stars in the handle of the Little Dipper constellation, said Penn State University astronomer David Burrows. How it looked wasn't remarkable, but the distance traveled was.” (Borenstein)
The reason the light given off by the exploding star was so intense and visible was that the star experienced what is known as a supernova.
“One of the most energetic explosive events known is a supernova. These occur at the end of a star's lifetime, when its nuclear fuel is exhausted and it is no longer supported by the release of nuclear energy. If the star is particularly massive, then its core will collapse and in so doing will release a huge amount of energy. This will cause a blast wave that ejects the star's envelope into interstellar space. The result of the collapse may be, in some cases, a rapidly rotating neutron star that can be observed many years later as a radio pulsar.” (Tyler)
As you can see, a supernova from a star forty times the size of our own sun would be a devastating force, destroying any matter in its path and giving off light and gamma rays that would be detectable some seven billion light years away.
“Before it exploded, the star was about 40 times bigger than our sun. The explosion vaporized any planet nearby, Gehrels said.” (Borenstein)
I believe this even holds significance for its scientific importance and for its humbling nature. The exploding star set a new world record for the most distant object that could be seen from Earth with the naked eye. This fact alone is mind-blowing, but it also provides us with a sense of perspective. Think about how fast the speed of light is. It is faster than anything in the universe and yet it still took over seven billion years to get here. That’s a one with nine zeros after it, and it’s not just days or months but full years. When faced with a distance such as that, it makes everything we do seem a little less important and it allows us to take a step back and realize just how small we, and our problems, are.














“Star Explodes Halfway Across the Universe.” Foxnews.com 21 March 2008. http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2008Mar21/0,4670,ExplodingStar,00.html
“The Swift Gamma-Ray Burst Mission.” Heasarc.nasa.gov 3 November 2008. http://heasarc.nasa.gov/docs/swift/swiftsc.html
“Supernova.” Heasarch.gsfc.nasa.gov 26 June 2003 http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/snr.htmlarch 2008.

Thursday, November 20, 2008

Activity IV


This is a screencapture from my Activity IV powerpoint. The "ism" is Annihilationsism which is the belief that instead of going to hell upon death, sinners are simply eradicated. The picture is of a burning corpse with its arms held above its head and hair splayed out above it. Tounges of flame are consuming the corpse and leading to what I assume will be its annihilation. This is my favorite "ism" and picture because of the finality to it all. It appeals to my religious sense as well as my belief that no quarter should be given to sinners.

Friday, November 7, 2008

Essay

Ryan Klaus
Professor Yerkes
Comp 106
6 November 2008
Formality’s Assassin

Is text messaging a key player in the destruction of formality and person-to-person relationships? Does it undermine the school system’s emphasis on correct grammar and spelling as well as sentence structure and sentence cohesion? The answer to both questions is a resounding “yes”. Despite their convenience and popularity, text messaging is silently and subtlety creating an environment and mindset in which emphasis is placed on quick, effortless sound bites and face-to-face interactions are discouraged.
“Another thing is that there is already a strong social pressure to carry a mobile phone (and therefore even strong opposition among some marginal groups, such as certain academic intellectuals). This is very much generational: the youngest generation could almost be identified with the help of the mobile phone so important it has become to their lifestyle. The use of textons (text messages or SMS; this French innovation should become universal) is one of such generational dividing lines, especially their use for serious messages (such as “I am leaving you, sorry”). (Roos 2001)”
Were people given fingers and thumbs for communication? Despite the importance of the written word in our daily lives, oral communication remains the most important means of communication between two individuals. It allows you to put emphasis on words, to instill emotions in your sentences. Oral communication creates a unique connection between to humans that just isn’t present in any other non face-to-face interaction; facial expressions and cues are lost and meaning is open to interpretation without the use of inflection. Communication is reduced to simply a means to an end, forgoing any personal benefit or lasting connection.
In fact, McKenna et al. (2002) found that the
lonely and socially anxious were better able to express themselves and develop close
friendships on the Internet than in the ‘real’ world. Whilst people with extensive
social networks and frequent intimate social contacts also use the Internet for social
purposes (Birnie & Horvath, 2002), many turn to it as a relatively safe environment in
which to form close and meaningful relationships “to make a reality out of their
virtual lives” (McKenna et al., 2002, p.30).
The preceding quote provides the base for my next point: that text messaging robs the less social-natured people the ability to develop intimate or even friendly relationships. Why would a socially anxious person ever need to venture outside their home or support structure if they can simply send a text message in place of actual encounter? In spite of the difficulties, face-to-face interactions actually end up helping nervous people cope with their social anxiety in that it forces them to overcome it. A nervous person isn’t going to be socially comfortable if they are constantly presented with the reinforcement (in the form of text messaging) that personal, social interactions are not necessary to function in society.
“According to Nokia’s world-wide survey of 3300 people (Nokia, 2001), the core mobile phone market is the under-45 age group. Over 80% of those sampled in this survey reported text-messaging as the most used function on their mobiles. Other studies have found that, in Britain at least, nearly 80% 14-16 year olds own mobiles (NOP, 2001; as cited in Thurlow, 2003), and that it is this teen market that dominates text-messaging, with 90% of teenagers claimed to text more than they talk on their phones (Haig, 2002). However, despite a small number of qualitative studies of teenagers’ use of text messaging (e.g. Thurlow, 2003;
Page 2
Kasesniemi & Rautiainen, 2002; Ling & Yttri, 2002; Puro, 2002)(Reid and Reid 2004)”
The other point I wanted to touch on was the fact that cell phones undermine the school’s teaching of the subject of English.
“While everyone recognizes that IM is widely used by adolescents and teens in the United States, there seem to be two distinct opinions of its effect on student academics. There are those who see the use of so-called "Internet English" as a breakdown of the English language – according to a recent newspaper article, "Some teachers see the creeping abbreviations as part of a continuing assault of technology on formal written English" (Lee, 2002).(O’Connor 2005)”
I have witnessed this breakdown of our language firsthand as emphasis is removed from correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation and instead placed on speed and punctuality. What use does a person have for proper English and grammar when it isn’t needed to communicate with his or her friends? It may not outwardly seem like it’s a big deal, but the destruction of the English language is just the first step on the path to the destruction of the other formal aspects of our society.











Bibliography

O’Connor, Amanda. “Instant Messaging: Friend or Foe of Student Writing?” New Horizons for Learning. 2005. The University of Washington. http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/literacy/oconnor.htm
Reid, Donna. Reid, Fraser. “Insights into the Social and Psychological Effects of SMS Text Messaging.” 2004. The University of Plymouth. http://www.160characters.org/documents/SocialEffectsOfTextMessaging.pdf
Roos. “Mobilezation.” Staff Papers. 2001. The University of Helsinki. http://www.valt.helsinki.fi/staff/jproos/mobilezation.htm